By ITCuli

I Tried Google’s New Image Editor, and It Could Replace Canva and Photoshop

I Tried Google’s New Image Editor, and It Could Replace Canva and Photoshop

Google Pics is Google’s new web-based image creation and editing tool for people using Google AI Pro or Google AI Ultra. It lives alongside Docs, Sheets and Slides in Google Workspace, so the pitch is straightforward: create a quick visual, or alter an existing image, without moving into a separate desktop editor. The product is interesting because it covers two jobs normally split between Canva-style layout tools and Photoshop-style image retouching. It is not a full replacement for either one, but it can remove a great deal of friction for simple work.

Google Pics AI image editor in Google Workspace
Google Pics combines prompt-driven generation and edits in a Workspace web app.

What Google Pics does

The main interface begins with a text prompt, much like Gemini. A user can describe a photorealistic scene, an event poster or another printed visual; more detail produces a more directed result. Before generating, the aspect-ratio menu lets the user choose dimensions, and that ratio can also be changed later. The Style box accepts a visual reference for the overall look. Existing material can be brought in through Upload, Google Drive or Google Photos rather than being created from scratch.

Google Pics uses Google’s Nano Banana image-generation technology. A request commonly produces four or five thumbnail alternatives, with an option to ask for four more. Google has not published a simple fixed usage quota. Its support guidance says users have “higher access” until February 2027, while resolution and other factors can affect how quickly a limit is reached. That uncertainty matters for teams planning recurring production work rather than occasional experiments.

Prompted design: fast, not magically precise

A practical example from Lifehacker was an A5 flyer for a child’s tenth birthday: the request specified the venue, a 3 p.m.—6 p.m. time slot, a Sunday date, balloons, streamers, cake, food, drink and parking information. Google Pics returned several bright, usable flyer options within seconds. This illustrates the tool’s best use: turning a well-written brief into a first draft. It can be effective for internal-event graphics, social-image concepts, simple posters and quick illustrations.

Users should nevertheless inspect every result. AI-generated lettering can be inaccurate, visual details may be inconsistent, and a polished-looking image may still fail a brand or accessibility requirement. Google Pics is helpful when a rough-to-good design is enough; it is not evidence that a generated asset has passed editorial approval.

Using prompts to edit visual elements in Google Pics
Detailed prompts and a visual check remain essential before publishing an AI-made asset.

Editing an existing image

Google Pics becomes more useful after an image is generated or loaded. It can identify visible elements such as a church, sky or mountains, allowing the user to click an element and request a change. A user can also drag a selection box over a region, then write an instruction such as “make this blue” for a balloon or “remove this person” for an unwanted figure. The same approach can transform a photo into a watercolor or comic, turn a daytime setting into a night scene, add a cloud, or alter the apparent age of a car.

Several changes can be queued and applied together. Text blocks in an image can also be selected and edited directly, avoiding another prompt in some cases. These workflow details make the app attractive for casual iteration: changing colors, adding an element and revising copy without repeatedly exporting and reimporting files.

Object removal needs realistic expectations. The system does not know what was physically behind a person, vehicle or other removed object. It estimates a replacement from nearby pixels and patterns. Small edits often look convincing, but removing buses, cars or objects in a detailed scene can expose implausible background reconstruction. Review at the intended export size, not only at a zoomed-out preview.

Where Canva and Photoshop still win

Google Pics is deliberately bare-bones. It offers undo, zoom and aspect-ratio changes, but lacks traditional manual retouching controls, drawing tools, conventional resize controls and layers. That limits it for pixel-accurate work, multi-element composites and repeatable production layouts. Photoshop remains the better fit for precise retouching and layered composition. Canva remains valuable for template libraries, reusable brand systems and controlled layouts. Google Pics is best considered a fast Workspace-adjacent assistant, not a wholesale migration target.

Google Pics practical evaluation checklist
Use Google Pics for speed, then validate output, permissions and production needs.

Practical checklist for administrators and creators

  • Confirm the user has Google AI Pro or Google AI Ultra and verify availability in the relevant Workspace environment.
  • Start with a specific brief: dimensions, subject, mandatory text, colors, composition and intended channel.
  • Use Upload, Drive and Photos only for material permitted by your organization’s data-handling rules.
  • Check generated text, faces, object boundaries, background reconstruction and brand requirements before distribution.
  • Keep the original file and use Google Pics for concepts or rapid edits; move to Canva or Photoshop for layers, templates and pixel-level finishing.
  • Track usage during pilot work because Google’s published guidance does not provide a simple permanent quota.

Conclusion

Google Pics lowers the barrier to making a usable visual inside Google Workspace. Its combination of Nano Banana generation, prompt-based edits, direct element selection and batch changes can save time on modest design tasks. The trade-off is control: it does not offer layers or the disciplined manual tools that advanced work requires. Treat it as a quick creative workspace, test it with non-sensitive material, and retain Canva or Photoshop where precision and repeatability matter.

Source

Source: Lifehacker, “I Tried Google’s New Image Editor, and It Could Replace Canva and Photoshop”.